Asus GL553VD

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus GL553VD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190429
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '23 at 11:27
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	SYR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 188 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 358 48% 358 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 15E0) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3734 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Lighting 28.5 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 31.4 23% 30 fps	MRender 34.2 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 20 23% 29 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 432 433 445 446 444 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 385 Write 157 Mixed 252 SusWrite 434 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 31.3 109% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 303 219% 280 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 95%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 309GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 99 85 95 96 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 91.6 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 95 58% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-008.A00G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	66.8% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 20.3 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 19.7 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 47: 0P 5R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
47%	22%	88	69	56	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE069C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,832x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1,138x
Core i7-7820HQIntelBench 63%, 15,851 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,441x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,525x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	4x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	273x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	248x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	203x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	664x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	312x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16