Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive422% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 10:31
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$328
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 157
2-Core 332
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 644
8-Core 1,111
106% 877 Pts
64-Core 1,515
94% 1,515 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Nvidia(10DE 167C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5950 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.42
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 142
Parallax 142
116% 142 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 142
Splatting 143
116% 142 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 113%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Lexar SSD NM790 2TB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11296 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3179 3247 3123 1511 823 843 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
422% Outstanding
Read 3,787
Write 3,644
Mixed 2,872
SusWrite 2,121
697% 3,106 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 86
304% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1257
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 1,079
803% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 232%
This bench: 422%
Great: 598%
Samsung MZ7LM960HCHP-00005 960GB
161GB free
Firmware: GXT1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 464 463 437 429 452 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 385
Write 346
Mixed 281
SusWrite 445
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 43.7
146% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 328
257% 355 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 105%
Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
46GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 483 481 482 482 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 483
Mixed 354
SusWrite 476
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 55.2
189% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
5GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 512
Write 276
Mixed 344
83% 377 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 22.9
122% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 0.5
57% 137 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 119 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 93.1
Write 124
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 117
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
161% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 61.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 47.6
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 34.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 45.3
102% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 42.9
93% 42.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 50 144 26.9" 1280 720 AUS272A ROG XG27UQ
Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $763
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback