Lenovo 82XR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82XR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 23:51
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 68.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 328
98% 187 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 778
86% 676 Pts
64-Core 855
53% 855 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 87%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3C38) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44.45
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 13
Parallax 22.5
11% 16.5 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 21.8
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GEJ4X112N 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1027 1067 1188 1046 1145 729 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,428
Write 1,524
Mixed 1,313
SusWrite 1,034
298% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 33.4
155% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 730
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 623
430% 544 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 189%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 4R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 18% 28 123 59 60 16" 1536 889 LEN9156
Typical 82XR Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82XR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback