HP t630 Thin Client

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	HP t630 Thin Client (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8158
Memory	7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '23 at 16:14
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E 191 User benchmarks, average bench 31% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Memory 27.7 1-Core 27.6 2-Core 45.4 21% 33.6 Pts	4-Core 57.4 8-Core 69 8% 63.2 Pts	64-Core 68.4 4% 68.4 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 8158) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.7.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 3.9 2% 3.6 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 3 Splatting 3.3 3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Midasforce 128GB 128GB 609 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0718B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 57 25 162 21 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 271 Write 299 Mixed 23 SusWrite 68.9 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 0.7 30% 9.4 MB/s	DQ Read 70 DQ Write 90.8 DQ Mixed 22.7 33% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 155%
Sandisk SD8SMAT-032G-1006 32GB 17GB free Firmware: Z2311006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 41 44 44 45 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

ASMT 2235 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 18GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 21 23 23 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 56.7 Write 17.6 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 22.4 32% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.4 18% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 12GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 271 15% 271 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	57	36	60	14.7"	1440 837	RTK1D1A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical t630 Thin Client Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP t630 Thin Client

CPU
Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7EAMDBench 31%, 191 samples	30x
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R7E GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 168 samples	29x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	1x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x

SSD
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	2x
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	2x
INTENSO 128GBBench 65%, 3,345 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	3x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	2x
M471A5143EB0-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 5,514 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16