Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel N95 1,411 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 62.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 179 64% 114 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 300 40% 299 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 811 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	2.87% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 3.7 3% 4.17 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 1.9 3% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.87% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NS512GSSD340 512GB 201 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 439GB free (System drive) Firmware: W0406B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 394 404 395 396 442 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 396 Mixed 381 SusWrite 401 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 22.8 131% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 37.7 88% 178 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kimtigo (HK) Limited KTB900D4S16-16GB 1x16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	42% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.4 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	4	60	23.5"	1280 720	SAM0D2C C24F390

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
N95IntelBench 49%, 1,411 samples	16x
N100IntelBench 50%, 2,388 samples	3x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 811 samples	16x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 1,086 samples	3x

RAM
Co Limited LD4AS016G-3200ST 1x16GBLexarBench 44%, 126 samples	8x
Co Limited LD4AS008G-2666SC 1x8GBLexarBench 31%, 23 samples	5x
4x2GBMicronBench 46%, 218 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16