bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 11:12
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5120
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 140
53% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 242
29% 224 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 67%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 86GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 272
Write 205
Mixed 250
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 15.6
62% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 269
158% 162 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 20.1
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 8.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 8 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback