Colorful H610M-K M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 231%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 262%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemColorful H610M-K M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful H610M-K M.2
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 10:05
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$204
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 194
2-Core 390
115% 221 Pts
4-Core 783
8-Core 1,541
137% 1,162 Pts
64-Core 2,308
143% 2,308 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 113%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,195
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 308
Reflection 301
Parallax 326
251% 312 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 252
Splatting 187
207% 264 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 209%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
533GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1665 1557 1533 1546 1566 1420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2,252
Write 2,111
Mixed 1,636
SusWrite 1,548
424% 1,887 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 88.2
307% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,860
DQ Write 1,496
DQ Mixed 1,668
1,252% 1,675 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 354%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
80GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 164 165 165 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 159
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 164
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
799GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 160 162 159 158 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 126
Write 114
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 158
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
104GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 105 103 104 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 69.7
Write 111
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 102
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 106%
WD WD10EVDS-63N5B1 1TB
8GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 90
Write 69.5
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 45.8
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZR 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 33.7
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 30.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 34.1" 1280 720 GSM773B 34GL750
Typical H610M-K M.2 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

System: Colorful H610M-K M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $498
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback