Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H77 Pro4/MVP  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '23 at 16:07
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 179
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 302
38% 289 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.5% Below average
Lighting 44
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 67.4
36% 56.1 fps
MRender 56
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 42.4
41% 50.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$94
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 482 495 484 497 485 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
86GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 130 131 151 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 174
Write 150
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 139
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-173.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-173.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 50 84.6" 1280 720 SAM713F Q90A
Typical H77 Pro4/MVP Builds (Compare 501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP - $164

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $761
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback