HP Pavilion m4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion m4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 193E
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130402
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 11 '23 at 15:37
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 75
2-Core 140
58% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 346
37% 294 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acer SA100 480GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11873
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 421 412 413 396 413 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 417
Write 426
Mixed 407
SusWrite 409
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 26.8
95% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 227
166% 216 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
338GB free
Firmware: 0002LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 96.1
Write 101
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 102
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Pavilion m4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion m4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback