Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 760GM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '23 at 15:26
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 109
56% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 324
32% 260 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 21.2
12% 21.2 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 24.7
18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V7 SSD 512GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0724A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 6.5 27 12 57 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.4% Poor
Read 212
Write 182
Mixed 129
SusWrite 30.4
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 1.3
43% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 40.7
DQ Mixed 1.3
9% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 CT102464BA160B.C16 16GB
333, 333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 13.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 11 182 16 60 57.8" 1280 720 VES3700 32FHD_LCD_TV
Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback