Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JA
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '23 at 05:06
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	KEN-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1005G1 22,960 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 75.5 1-Core 110 2-Core 180 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 257 34% 252 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1EC1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 7.5 6% 6.83 fps	MRender 8.4 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 9.9 7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 256GB 22,335 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: 70000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 229 233 232 238 238 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	67% Good	Read 459 Write 446 Mixed 392 SusWrite 252 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 30.7 100% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 56.2 DQ Mixed 33 27% 37.9 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 97%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 836GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 130 131 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 145 Write 144 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 131 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 0.6 243% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2667, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 19.1 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 18.1 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15E6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	310x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	213x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	37x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	523x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	37x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	74x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	49x
HFM256GDJTNG-831 256GBNvmeBench 128%, 3,461 samples	29x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	181x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	119x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16