Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6502ZC
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '23 at 04:09
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 170
2-Core 340
103% 196 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 892
92% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 38
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 35.1
31% 33.9 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 37.6
24% 27.3 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1478 1775 1702 2011 1019 1124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,350
Write 2137
Mixed 1,365
SusWrite 1518
361% 1,592 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 69.8
259% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 695
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 530
387% 515 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 249%
Great: 305%
Nvme ADATA SX6000LNP 1TB
347GB free
Firmware: VC2S038D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1048 1190 789 191 169 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,726
Write 1,185
Mixed 797
SusWrite 592
239% 1,075 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 52.6
173% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 690
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 487
364% 495 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 181%
Great: 226%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44BM0-CWE Transcend JM3200HSE-16G 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 31.8
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 24.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 27 4 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5BC6 LG FHD
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback