Asus H81M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H81M-A  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '17 at 09:41
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 293
35% 268 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.9.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 32
Parallax 31.1
21% 29.7 fps
MRender 31.1
Gravity 25
Splatting 35.3
25% 30.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandis S128G 126GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 420
Write 262
Mixed 303
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 6.66
32% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 8.85
10% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 48%
WD WD10EALX-009BA0 1TB
641GB free
Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 148
Write 118
Mixed 119
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.4
120% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 74%
Samsun HD322GJ 320GB
118GB free
Firmware: 1AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 111
Write 102
Mixed 118
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.41
108% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 80%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
7GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Read 35
Write 4.88
Mixed 7.25
14% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.007
18% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $313
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback