Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3V-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3V-A  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 16:55
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 189
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 270
33% 252 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 5.9
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Glowy 120GB 120GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3G5P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 317 352 357 217 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 289
Write 344
Mixed 306
SusWrite 284
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 37.2
133% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 86.8
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 142
121% 170 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
339GB free
Firmware: A7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 166 163 167 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 156
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 164
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 103%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
30GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 13 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 258
Write 14.5
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 13.3
61% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
60% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TLD38G16S10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 18 60 18.5" 1280 720 ACR0069
Typical GA-B85M-D3V-A Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3V-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback