Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron B730 25 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Onboard, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Memory 46.2 1-Core 20 2-Core 17.8 22% 28 Pts	4-Core 23.7 8-Core 24.7 3% 24.2 Pts	64-Core 18.9 1% 18.9 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	1.2% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.2% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A381 320GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES2OA70E SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 34 36 53 30 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 53.2 Write 40.8 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 37.6 28% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-YK0 2x2GB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	36	29	60	15.5"	1280 720	FUJ5612

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron B730IntelBench 36%, 25 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-YK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 49%, 310 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16