Voltriq VI900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemVoltriq VI900  (all builds)
MotherboardVoltriq VI900
Memory124.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 09:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i9-11900T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 80.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 305
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 617
66% 526 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 0.9
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 1TB
801GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 399 397 388 406 411 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AAR32GD4081823030 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 37
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 27.8
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 49 60 19.5" 1280 720 PTL0195 V20HS
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback