TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Amazon c6in.8xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAmazon c6in.8xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 06:58
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
73% 136 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 871
79% 665 Pts
64-Core 2,203
136% 2,203 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 75.1%
 Great: 82%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 122 123 125 125 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
Read 126
Write 187
Mixed 134
SusWrite 126
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 6.8
1,194% 6.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
229% Outstanding
MC Read 87.2
MC Write 125
MC Mixed 79.1
277% 97.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 9.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 229%
 Great: 241%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 32 0 0" 1280 720
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback