HP 700-229c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-229c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 02:21
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 536
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2AF7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 5
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 256GB SSD 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3130A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 383 401 248 144 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 475
Write 428
Mixed 349
SusWrite 265
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 11.2
88% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 14.8
65% 140 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 164%
Exram 128GB 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: HP2818E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 224 228 222 229 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.5% Above average
Read 232
Write 228
Mixed 214
SusWrite 225
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 12
73% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 15.7
46% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 158%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 11.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 17 60 20" 1280 720 HWP2889 HP 2010
Typical 700-229c Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-229c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback