TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GD30CI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago, 17 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 2 months ago, 1 month ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsus GD30CI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GD30CI
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 02:02
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 193
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 634
61% 505 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 77.4%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$246
Asus(1043 881D)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.42
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 152
Parallax 110
0% 87.6 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 102
Splatting 83.9
86% 108 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 29.3%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1002 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 88 79 85 87 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 483
Write 318
Mixed 203
SusWrite 83.3
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 40.6
152% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 183
162% 246 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 83.4%
 Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
445GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 136 137 134 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 146
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 135
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 78.3%
 Great: 109%
Asus FX 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 81 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 107
Write 120
Mixed 107
SusWrite 78.2
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
211% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 53.4%
 Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 25.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 80.3%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 57: 0P 5R 10G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
57% 22% 76 175 57 60 27" 1920 1080 AUS27C0 ASUS VZ279HE
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GD30CI Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Asus GD30CI

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples561x
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples28x
Core i7-6700KIntel  $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples2x
GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples203x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples99x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples65x
SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples87x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples48x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples30x
RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples173x
M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 5,600 samples107x
HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 43%, 3,066 samples32x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback