Asus N73JG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus N73JG  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N73JG
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110131
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateOct 09 '23 at 22:31
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 123
51% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 157
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1562) 3.8GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 145 168 190 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.6% Average
Read 231
Write 193
Mixed 206
SusWrite 177
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 19
65% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 52.4
DQ Mixed 84.4
72% 111 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
402GB free
Firmware: 0002YXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 110 121 132 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 102
Mixed 69
SusWrite 126
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EH1-CF8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 9.7
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 26 60 17.2" 1280 720 SEC544B
Typical N73JG Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N73JG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback