Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '23 at 08:39
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 173
2-Core 350
107% 202 Pts
4-Core 655
8-Core 1,213
112% 934 Pts
64-Core 1539
95% 1539 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 102
Parallax 71.4
89% 94.4 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 91.5
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU700 480GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B170428a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 97 106 94 55 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62% Good
Read 477
Write 47.7
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 84.4
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 25.9
107% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 78.5
DQ Mixed 115
87% 118 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62%
Great: 93%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3209 3277 3241 3288 3287 3288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
483% Outstanding
Read 2,828
Write 3,371
Mixed 3,055
SusWrite 3265
708% 3,130 MB/s
4K Read 76.8
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 109
358% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,470
DQ Write 1,180
DQ Mixed 1,322
990% 1,324 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 483%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 36.4
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 0P 5R 10G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
64% 30% 81 549 465 60 27.2" 2194 1163 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
History: Score 62: 0P 5R 10G 7B | Score 64: 0P 5R 10G 9B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $983
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback