Lenovo 10KW007EGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10KW007EGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 0x30F617AA
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '23 at 21:55
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User LUX-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 199
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 415
50% 383 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 858D) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.4% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 35
Parallax 28
23% 30.4 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 29
Splatting 26
24% 30 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427GN1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 364 383 410 424 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 391
Mixed 365
SusWrite 381
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 39.8
133% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 234
184% 251 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 114%
USB 3.1 1TB
39GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 361 257 175 145 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 358
Write 360
Mixed 338
SusWrite 228
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 31
100% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 113
93% 131 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 20.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 22.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0CC5 S27E650
Typical 10KW007EGE Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10KW007EGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback