HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '23 at 15:50
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 214
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 575
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420
Nvidia(10DE 1106) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 4%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 1998) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 6.9
3% 4.5 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 320 323 325 303 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 407
Write 388
Mixed 340
SusWrite 328
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 39.6
129% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 347
263% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 124%
HP S700 1TB
322GB free
Firmware: SN10033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 404 403 398 391 406 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 399
Write 384
Mixed 352
SusWrite 404
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 16
64% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 23.9
16% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IMT41GU6MFR8W-TA2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 15.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 19
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 VSC6F2E VA2246 SERIES
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback