HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15-bw0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8331
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '23 at 14:04
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Memory 31.1
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 48.6
24% 39 Pts
4-Core 50
8-Core 50.1
7% 50 Pts
64-Core 49
3% 49 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 8331) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 7
4% 5.57 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 8
Splatting 12.4
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 97 88 73 69 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 304
Write 308
Mixed 224
SusWrite 89.9
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 20.5
68% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 114
91% 129 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
534GB free
Firmware: RSM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 83 79 94 95 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 71
Write 77.3
Mixed 39
SusWrite 86.9
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
92% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5644EB0-CRC Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 6GB
1866, 1866 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 260
15% 260 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 3 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0687
Typical Laptop 15-bw0xx Builds (Compare 707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback