Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X415EA
Memory	1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221110
Uptime	10.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '23 at 13:04
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 1,300 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 58.2 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 163 60% 106 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 221 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 39,662 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4255 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	8.08% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 7.1 Parallax 12.9 8% 10 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 13.3 Splatting 11.8 8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.08% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme FORESEE P900F128GH 128GB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.7.11H Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 90 84 88 84 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 758 Write 446 Mixed 400 SusWrite 96.8 94% 425 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 21.3 102% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 70.3 111% 216 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 132%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40 16,752 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 169GB free Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 115 115 115 115 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 305 Write 245 Mixed 92.4 SusWrite 123 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 10.7 44% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 7.5 53% 122 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Kingston 9905711-015.A00G 8GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 3200, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.1% Average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 13.5 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 7.3 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	0	13.9"	1280 720	CMN14D4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA

CPU
Core i3-1115G4IntelBench 51%, 18,815 samples	155x
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples	79x
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples	18x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	167x
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	97x

SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples	65x
KINGSTON OM8PDP3128B-AB1 128GBNvmeBench 103%, 215 samples	52x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	30x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 71%, 1,143 samples	26x
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 67%, 2,461 samples	25x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 34%, 6,590 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16