MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20170328
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '23 at 10:09
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 71 1-Core 108 2-Core 212 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 804 74% 618 Pts	64-Core 1109 69% 1109 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.1 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.4% Above average	Lighting 63.4 Reflection 60.4 Parallax 86.6 52% 70.1 fps	MRender 62.9 Gravity 72.6 Splatting 45.7 48% 60.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 448 Write 413 Mixed 176 76% 346 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 71.5 4K Mixed 21.9 97% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 141 111% 152 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 95%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 354GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 466 Write 468 Mixed 456 104% 463 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 51.7 171% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 360 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB 8,778 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 10GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 25.6 Write 4.5 Mixed 12.4 15% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.4 106% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3200C 2x8GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 28.5 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 21.6 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 96.5 41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	54.6"	1280 720	XXX2851 Beyond TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	102x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	100x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	76x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	65x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	64x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	27x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	67x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $411

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16