Asus PRIME B450M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-K  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 08 '23 at 03:16
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 259
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 816
79% 652 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 180
Parallax 186
148% 182 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 159
Splatting 132
132% 165 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk G5 B 500GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 198 208 208 208 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 432
Mixed 298
SusWrite 216
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 46.6
161% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 255
217% 320 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 95%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 79 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 78.3
Write 66.9
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 79
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS54501 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: PB1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 68 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 66.8
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 68.1
41% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 40%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
643GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 114 111 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 112
Write 90.3
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 111
124% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
161% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 32.8
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 32
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.5" 1920 1080 MSI3BA0 MSI G24C4
Typical PRIME B450M-K Builds (Compare 3,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $466
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback