HP Laptop 17-by2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive13% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-by2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 865A
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220329
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateOct 08 '23 at 00:46
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 169
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 320
36% 283 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 865A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.97 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9.7
7% 7.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD10SPSX-08A6W 1TB
730GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 101 96 112 117 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 105
Write 121
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 103
22% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.7
8% 4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 0.3
2% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 9.7
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 7% 107 35 1 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN175E
Typical Laptop 17-by2xxx Builds (Compare 250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-by2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback