Tongfang GK5CP6Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTongfang GK5CP6Z  (all builds)
MotherboardTongfang GK5CP6Z
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 21:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 206
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 602
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1065) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.4 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 68 64 63 66 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 475
Write 406
Mixed 378
SusWrite 117
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 36.1
120% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 318
239% 320 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM4X16GE2400C16S4 029E CMSX16GX4M1A2400C16 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.8% Good
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 21.6
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07AF
Typical GK5CP6Z Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Tongfang GK5CP6Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback