Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210705
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '23 at 20:46
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 66.8 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 173 61% 108 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 274 37% 277 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% HP(103C 838F) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Lighting 29.4 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 26.2 24% 28.3 fps	MRender 33.1 Gravity 32.1 Splatting 19.7 22% 28.3 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1135 816 796 772 742 730 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	202% Outstanding	Read 1,831 Write 1,593 Mixed 1,356 SusWrite 832 314% 1,403 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 50 161% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 784 DQ Write 461 DQ Mixed 538 423% 594 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 202% Great: 410%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 763GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 76 75 77 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 49 Write 64.3 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 74.7 45% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC M471A2K43DB1-CTD 24GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2400, 2667 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.3% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 15.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
24%	15%	80	431	282	60	23.6"	1920 1080	MSI1462 Optix G241VC

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,364x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	791x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	785x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	297x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	275x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	160x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	351x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	310x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16