HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 16:03
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2123
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 203
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 581
59% 478 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
HP(103C 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 20.2
18% 23.4 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 22.3
19% 22.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 447
Write 404
Mixed 353
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 18.6
100% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 32.5
87% 180 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
927GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 201
Write 176
Mixed 104
119% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 9.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 22" 1280 720 FUS0710 L22W-3
Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback