Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 13:59
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 164
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 567
54% 445 Pts
64-Core 769
48% 769 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Asus(1043 042C) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1280 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 31
Parallax 30.4
20% 28.5 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 21.3
19% 23 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XR0120GEBLT 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 128 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 378
Write 134
Mixed 194
SusWrite 129
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 29
101% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 97.4
DQ Mixed 30.5
61% 127 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 71%
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
167GB free
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 141 145 158 155 127 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 236
Write 138
Mixed 190
SusWrite 142
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 28.8
103% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 123
105% 154 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 82%
Adata SU630 240GB
178GB free
Firmware: XD0R3C0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 230 226 231 235 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.2% Good
Read 256
Write 232
Mixed 220
SusWrite 229
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 28.6
96% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 179
130% 165 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10F/8 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 34.4
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 0 57.8" 1280 720 PHL0000 Philips FTV
Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback