Biostar A520MH 3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar A520MH 3.0  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 13:54
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 881
87% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 91.4
Reflection 88.6
Parallax 82.6
74% 87.5 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 71.5
69% 86.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SH00E1TB 1TB
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11475
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,930
Write 2,131
Mixed 1,750
433% 1,937 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 80.3
272% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 852
DQ Mixed 962
698% 905 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 277%
SanDisk Cruzer Pop 16GB
10GB free, PID 5577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 58.9
Write 14
Mixed 14.9
28% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
84% 7.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-32N2200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.8
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 34.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 32" 2560 1440 ELD6886 T430QVN01
Typical A520MH 3.0 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A520MH 3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback