HP Laptop 14-dk1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 14-dk1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85E0
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210922
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 06:38
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 175
58% 106 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 320
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics
HP(103C 85E0) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 15.2
2% 10.3 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 11
Splatting 13.3
10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 193 237 247 252 227 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 724
Write 337
Mixed 264
SusWrite 234
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 31.4
86% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 261
205% 287 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 8GB
2667, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO733C
Typical Laptop 14-dk1xxx Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-dk1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback