Monster TULPAR T5 V23.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V23.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V23.1
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '23 at 14:26
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500HX
U29, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 195
2-Core 377
113% 216 Pts
4-Core 752
8-Core 1,310
125% 1,031 Pts
64-Core 2104
130% 2104 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A650) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 154
Parallax 140
143% 157 fps
MRender 221
Gravity 118
Splatting 95.7
112% 145 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL41T0HBLB-00B07 1TB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7002Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 1630 918 1796 1837 1887 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,093
Write 745
Mixed 526
SusWrite 1,420
213% 946 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 46.5
173% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 660
DQ Mixed 398
411% 681 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 220%
Great: 379%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 58.5
MC Mixed 55.2
166% 58 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 30.5
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 150%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 15.5" 1536 793 BOE08B3
Typical TULPAR T5 V23.1 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V23.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback