Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

8 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506IC
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1760 x 990 - 32 Bit colores, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '23 at 14:00
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H 27,218 User benchmarks, average bench 70% FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 59.5 1-Core 127 2-Core 243 76% 143 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 674 67% 546 Pts	64-Core 739 46% 739 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU) 162,082 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Asus(1043 11DC) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Lighting 13.5 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 16.6 11% 15.6 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 14.9 Splatting 15.4 12% 13.8 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 17%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU 38,648 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Asus(1043 11DC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.78 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.4% Average	Lighting 54.3 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 45.3 44% 57.6 fps	MRender 64.5 Gravity 49.7 Splatting 51.8 45% 55.3 fps
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 65%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GB 1,706 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1004 873 97 146 191 144 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 1,011 Write 856 Mixed 736 SusWrite 409 168% 753 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 36 121% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 647 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 479 339% 442 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 229%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2667, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.5% Average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 17.7 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 8.9 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	46	144	15.5"	1280 720	NCP004D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC Builds (Compare 784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 26,507 samples	687x
Ryzen 5 4600HAMDBench 70%, 27,218 samples	97x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	498x
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 55%, 38,648 samples	286x

SSD
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBBench 217%, 9,047 samples	305x
MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GBSamsungBench 159%, 1,706 samples	283x
MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 166%, 12,842 samples	110x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	159x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GBMicronBench 39%, 6,335 samples	90x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16