Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '23 at 20:41
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 67.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
78% 146 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 834
78% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,311
81% 1,311 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,800
Asus(1043 889C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.42
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 411
Reflection 528
Parallax 734
335% 558 fps
Gravity 556
Splatting 298
360% 427 fps
Poor: 303% Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 824 824 826 827 813 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,182
Write 2,023
Mixed 1,636
SusWrite 856
375% 1,674 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 77.9
257% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,192
DQ Write 826
DQ Mixed 1,008
753% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 264%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
122GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 409 418 283 282 282 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 404
Mixed 380
SusWrite 343
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 46.2
152% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 370
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
116GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 199 310 221 266 276 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 194
Write 94.4
Mixed 80
SusWrite 265
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 9.2
37% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
128GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 136 143 136 135 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 131
Mixed 30
SusWrite 135
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
360GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 153 146 149 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
69% Good
Read 92
Write 108
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 148
67% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-8GTZNC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 25
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 20
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 31.7" 1280 720 SAM7256 Odyssey G8
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $951
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback