MSI MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D18
MotherboardMSI MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '23 at 20:05
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 228
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 597
59% 484 Pts
64-Core 806
50% 806 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 117
Parallax 155
135% 146 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 132
Splatting 106
116% 148 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PH6-CE120 120GB
51GB free
Firmware: F/W:1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 152 84 85 84 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 454
Write 346
Mixed 348
SusWrite 148
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 31.7
126% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 189
168% 249 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 84%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
73GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 220 224 224 178 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 406
Mixed 354
SusWrite 228
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 45.8
152% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 327
252% 342 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 114%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 633 327 327 325 309 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,716
Write 1,346
Mixed 603
SusWrite 371
223% 1,009 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 47.1
178% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 664
568% 842 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 187%
Great: 236%
MG04ACA400N 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: FJ3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 136 153 150 152 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 110
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 147
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 38.3
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 26
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2413 AG241QG
Typical MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18) Builds (Compare 2,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $514
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback