Dell Precision 7920 Tower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision 7920 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 060K5C
Memory50.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 05 '23 at 16:06
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5118
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 174
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 643
58% 490 Pts
64-Core 2,419
150% 2,419 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
Dell(1028 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 9.4
9% 11 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 12.1
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
39GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86.5
Write 18.9
Mixed 46
54% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
88% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 38%
USB Flash Memory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 258
Write 20.4
Mixed 2.7
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
80% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G6J1 8x8GB
8 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 29.4
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 27 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA0B9 DELL U2415
Typical Precision 7920 Tower Builds (Compare 806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Dell Precision 7920 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback