Lenovo 10SFS0C700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10SFS0C700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3132
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230324
Uptime9 Days
Run DateOct 05 '23 at 10:00
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 86
1-Core 131
2-Core 262
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 814
82% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 550X
Device(1642 1865) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.18.14
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 21.9
0% 16.6 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 25.1
19% 22.6 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 6.47%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SA530 SDATB8Y256G1001 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40102101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 221 205 221 222 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 447
Write 451
Mixed 287
SusWrite 220
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 20.9
93% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 76.3
61% 87.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24.1" 1280 720 LEN61B4 LEN T24d-10
Typical 10SFS0C700 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10SFS0C700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback