Biostar A320MH

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar A320MH (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201105
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '23 at 05:08
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE w/ Radeon Graphics 28 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 70.9 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 155 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 264 34% 255 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 6333) 2GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 23.5 Parallax 19 15% 20.4 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 17.3 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pichau Gaming PG256X 256GB 1,192 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN09610 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 265 247 245 262 270 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 355 Write 251 Mixed 258 SusWrite 252 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 29 106% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 164 130% 176 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 479GB 2,088 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 357GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 281 252 90 90 91 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	79% Very good	Read 406 Write 270 Mixed 272 SusWrite 173 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 32.6 128% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 214 183% 269 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB 7,481 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	82.9% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 28.8 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 23 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	51	60	18.4"	1360 768	GSM4BCE W1946

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	266x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	196x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $89Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	126x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	129x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	112x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	77x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	47x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	48x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	44x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 78%, 7,481 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $328

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16