PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Acer Veriton M6610 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer Veriton M6610 |
Memory | 15.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110608 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 05 '23 at 04:02 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | TWN-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
69.2%
Good
|
68% 115 Pts
|
44% 359 Pts
|
27% 440 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.2%
Poor
|
27% 34.3 fps
|
24% 30.1 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 210 251 285 288 286 MB/s
|
74.8%
Very good
|
72% 320 MB/s
|
102% 36.3 MB/s
|
139% 210 MB/s
|
![]() PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 240GB
219GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
7% 30.9 MB/s
|
30% 6.97 MB/s
|
|
![]() Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
272GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 119 120 119 120 MB/s
|
69%
Good
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
146% 1 MB/s
|
|
![]() Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
69GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 109 111 113 115 MB/s
|
76.4%
Very good
|
78% 108 MB/s
|
124% 1.1 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
48.2%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
57% 70.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | VSCC336 VX3211-4K |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-2400SIntel $70Bench 60%, 10,987 samples | 10x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 7x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 6x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 5x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $70 |