Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M LE (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110331
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '23 at 14:10
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 77.3 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 177 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 326 43% 323 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 844D) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.05% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.05% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 235 227 231 226 226 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 373 Write 342 Mixed 303 SusWrite 248 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 35.8 120% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 42.7 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 58.3 50% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 124%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB 11,411 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 94GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 70 71 69 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 72.5 Write 72.1 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 69.2 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5595-002.A00LF 4GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.4% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 11.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 11 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	57	45	60	23"	1280 720	SAM076E SMBX2331

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	72x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	71x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	57x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x

RAM
CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 43%, 520 samples	22x
CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 8GBCorsairBench 48%, 288 samples	14x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $274

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16