Asus PRIME A520M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-A  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 09:48
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 166
2-Core 318
101% 189 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,130
106% 878 Pts
64-Core 1,490
92% 1,490 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
168% Outstanding
Lighting 252
Reflection 222
Parallax 219
205% 231 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 165
Splatting 131
144% 184 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 168%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,066
Write 1658
Mixed 1,247
298% 1,324 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 62.4
234% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 861
DQ Mixed 849
622% 807 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 299%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 192 196 197 203 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 133
Write 154
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 196
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4BU016G-3200XG 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 32.4
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 32.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.7" 1280 720 XMI23C3 Mi Monitor
Typical PRIME A520M-A Builds (Compare 340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $106
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback