Lenovo 90ED0057MW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90ED0057MW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3642
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 06:50
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 163
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 289
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.9% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 66.7
58% 70.3 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 66.6
55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-512 512GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 163 40 167 79 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 285
Write 123
Mixed 286
SusWrite 94.6
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 18.4
67% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 158
155% 246 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 96%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 317 378 387 435 446 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 385
Write 350
Mixed 321
SusWrite 380
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 27.8
89% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 353
265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST1000DX001-SSHD-8GB 1TB
319GB free
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 117 117 114 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 135
Write 178
Mixed 30
SusWrite 115
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 2
374% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 43 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical 90ED0057MW Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 90ED0057MW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback