| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R930 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3118-A2 |
| Memory | 56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180628 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 04 '23 at 06:19 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
68.6%
Good
|
60% 102 Pts
|
50% 408 Pts
|
48% 780 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD FirePro W8000
AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
30% 40.5 fps
|
24% 29.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
632GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 233 235 235 232 235 MB/s
|
64.6%
Good
|
50% 224 MB/s
|
106% 34.8 MB/s
|
117% 161 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
325GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 714 361 374 371 373 374 MB/s
|
170%
Outstanding
|
312% 1,398 MB/s
|
149% 48.3 MB/s
|
251% 338 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
99.3%
Outstanding
|
114% 40 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
51% 78 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | VSCE635 VX3276-QHD |
Typical CELSIUS R930 Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R930
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 4x |
| Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples | 4x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v21stBench 57%, 469 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 5x |
| RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples | 5x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |