ECS H81H3-M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H81H3-M4  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 03:28
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 495
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 526
33% 526 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 38.9
35% 41 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 27.3
28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 69 73 76 74 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 92.3
Write 89.8
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 72.3
57% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
29GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 126 132 128 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 114
Write 102
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 130
67% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 48 75 19.1" 1280 720 HWP26E8 HP L1950
Typical H81H3-M4 Builds (Compare 994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback