Intel H81

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardIntel H81  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 01:21
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 314
41% 309 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
Gigabyte(1458 2404) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 81.7
36% 62.5 fps
MRender 98.6
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 27.1
43% 57.1 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 399 402 417 420 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 349
Write 406
Mixed 356
SusWrite 403
86% 378 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 33.7
122% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 191
168% 246 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 100%
Sobetter Ext 320GB
243GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 29.2
Write 34.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 40.9
22% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
5GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.6 4.2 4.2 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 108
Write 9.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.6
25% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 2% 44 214 56 60 7.2" 1920 1080 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical H81 Builds (Compare 2,798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H81

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback