Lenovo 82WQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive387% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82WQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230620
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 09:31
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 66.7
1-Core 211
2-Core 428
119% 235 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 947
91% 751 Pts
64-Core 1,668
103% 1,668 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3B64) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 532.10
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 240
Parallax 216
162% 218 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 175
Splatting 166
170% 215 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 152%
Great: 218%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2673 1873 1867 1857 1897 1124 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
387% Outstanding
Read 2,572
Write 2,726
Mixed 2887
SusWrite 1882
568% 2,517 MB/s
4K Read 75.8
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 98.2
346% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,550
DQ Write 1,272
DQ Mixed 1,415
1,059% 1,413 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 387%
Great: 458%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
176% Outstanding
MC Read 75.3
MC Write 69
MC Mixed 66.7
201% 70.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 46.1
SC Mixed 28.2
90% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 176%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 16" 1280 720 BOE0B8B
Typical 82WQ Builds (Compare 1,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 256%
UFO

System: Lenovo 82WQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback