Samsung 750XFG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 750XFG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP750XFG-KB1AR
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230803
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 02:10
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 56.4
1-Core 175
2-Core 279
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 846
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1D3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 24.3
18% 24.4 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 18.8
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GB
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1039 1112 1054 1043 304 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 792
Write 854
Mixed 655
SusWrite 786
174% 772 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 35
124% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 832
DQ Write 837
DQ Mixed 948
681% 872 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 155%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AB-MGCL 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 47.9
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 46.1
SC Mixed 24.2
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 123%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 8 60 15.5" 1536 841 BOE0AD9
Typical 750XFG Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 750XFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback